Windows 7... lightweight?

Discussion in 'Windows' started by lroy12, Nov 10, 2008.

  1. lroy12

    lroy12

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was wondering how lightweight windows7 was compared to XP, vista, or ubuntu. I have heard that it uses less ram and cpu than vista but XP still wins in memory.. is this true? Is anyone running the beta satisfied with it on the ONE?
     
    lroy12, Nov 10, 2008
    #1
  2. lroy12

    Guest Guest

    The final build may be more lightweight but beta build 6801 was pretty much the same as Vista. A clean install produced about the same memory footprint and the same number of running processes. I played with it for a couple of days but went back to my Vista image. My guess is that Microsoft has yet to tweak the install process for Netbook class hardware. Given how much they've talked about it lately I'm guessing we won't see the improvements until the January public beta release.
     
    Guest, Nov 10, 2008
    #2
  3. lroy12

    Guest Guest

    This Slashdot story confirms what I suspected all along. The M3 build is still VERY much the same as Vista.

    http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/11/11/0110251.shtml

    Microsoft has put a lot of information out there about how 7 will be faster, smaller and more lightweight. Clearly they still have work to do.
     
    Guest, Nov 11, 2008
    #3
  4. lroy12

    rory

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London, UK
    runs the same speed if not faster than vista
     
    rory, Nov 12, 2008
    #4
  5. lroy12

    DiSK

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I was trying out Build 6956 in VirtualBox, and I can say that, currently, XP still beats it in regular speed. My XP virtual machine had only 256MB RAM, while my Windows 7 one had 512MB, and still, the XP seemed to run better. However, XP has been around for so many years, so it should obviously be good. I wasn't old enough to use XP when it came out, so I don't know all the quirks and whatnot that it had back in it's betas (were they even availible to the public? Probably, piracy goes back a long way :lol:). So, keep in mind that Windows 7 isn't even in beta yet, and it should be improved greatly by the time it is actually released.
     
    DiSK, Dec 15, 2008
    #5
  6. lroy12

    lolknight

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    double post
     
    lolknight, Dec 17, 2008
    #6
  7. lroy12

    lolknight

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    playing a 1080P full HD movie:

    XP - doesn't lag, plays smooth, ~85% CPU usage
    Vista -lags every few seconds, not watchable
    7 - skips every now and then, mildly annoying but watchable

    in terms of memory use, windows 7 is about the same as vista, if not slightly lower

    it does feel a lot faster than vista though.

    edit: this is on 6801 btw, so YMMV if you're using 6956
     
    lolknight, Dec 17, 2008
    #7
  8. lroy12

    lohtse

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Where ever I'm sent....
    Have tried it liked it(very nice looking) but went back to to Vista... will wait till final build comes out as no benifits as yet with 7..


    regards
    Andrew
     
    lohtse, Dec 17, 2008
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.